They witness a robbery in broad daylight.
The robber has their turn in their pocket, while the target shouts that the person features a weapon. Once the robber operates away, a policeman seems in the scene; but rather of pursuing the robber, he arrests Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer for having violated the latest “Good Samaritan” law associated with city. Because the four of them invested the full time associated with the robbery making enjoyable of this target, who was simply fat, their role into the matter does not look good, and also at their test everybody who’s got ever thought wronged by them for the duration of the tv show testifies against them. These are typically convicted. Is this simply? Exactly exactly What had been they likely to do through the robbery? Should they will have hurried the robber, in the event he did not genuinely have a weapon?
Remember that this might be a poor “Good Samaritan” legislation, which generally speaking are guidelines written to safeguard those (from liability) whom make an effort to make help, perhaps maybe perhaps not need individuals in exactly what can be circumstances that are questionable make help. Laws aid that is requiring in some places and can even be thought in danger of the abuse evident in this situation.
A cup that is poisonous of. Grassians uses “Tom” and “Joe” because the killers, therefore the entire instance here is restated with Jane and Debbie substituted in the interests of gender equality. Read more